JUDGMENT : Narendra Singh Dhaddha, J. 1. The present appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been preferred by the claimant-appellant (for short 'the claimant') against the judgment and award dated 19.06.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bundi (for short 'the Tribunal') in Claim Case No. 516/2008 titled as "Mujjafar Ali v. Roop Chand and Anr." whereby the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 72, 227/- along with interest @ 6% per annum to be paid 12.12.2008 as compensation in favour of the claimant. 2. Learned counsel for the claimant submits that the Tribunal has committed an error in not considering the disability certificate filed by the claimant. Learned counsel for the claimant further submits that as per disability certificate, the claimant suffered 15% permanent disability but the Tribunal has not considered the loss of income on account of disability as suffered by him. The Tribunal has not awarded any amount under the head of future prospects. So, judgment of the Tribunal be modified accordingly. 3. Despite service of notice, none has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2. 4. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned order. 5. It is an admitted position that the claimant was a Government Servant and he did not suffer any monetary loss on account of said disability. Even he did not produce the Doctor in evidence to prove the disability certificate. Thus, the Tribunal has rightly rejected the claim under the head of loss of income as well as future prospects. Since, 15% disability was not in relation to the whole body, the Tribunal has rightly awarded Rs. 40, 000/- for such disability. So, the appeal filed by the claimant being, devoid of merit, is liable be dismissed which stand dismissed accordingly.