Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2024 DIGILAW 471 (RAJ)

Siyaram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

2024-03-18

PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

body2024
ORDER : Praveer Bhatnagar, J. Apprehending the arrest in connection with FIR No.358/2023 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 366 and 379 of IPC, the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the prosecutrix herself went with the petitioner and stayed for four days with him. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner and prosecutrix were having friendly relationship and marriage was solemnized between them in Araya Samaj. Therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant vehemently oppose the anticipatory bail application of the present petitioner. 4. Heard the perused the case diary. 5. Considering the fact that the prosecutrix herself is major and stayed with the petitioner, thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Siyaram Meena S/o Shri. Gulab Singh, in connection with FIR No.358/2023 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Alwar, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.