JUDGMENT : (Ravindra Maithani, J.) : Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 03 of 2024, under Section 8/20/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Satpuli, District Pauri Garhwal. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, on 05.03.2024, the police were on patrolling duty, they were checking the vehicle, a car driven by the applicant reached at the spot, in the front passenger seat, the applicant has kept a bag. The Bag had 21 Kg. ganja in it. According to the FIR, from the rear seat also 9.400 Kg. ganja was also recovered from the co-accused. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that, in fact, the exact weight of the contraband is not given in the FIR. It is highly improbable that a person while driving a vehicle would hold something with his hand. The co-accused has already been granted bail. 5. Learned State counsel would submit that the weight of the recovered article was done in the court and as per report, it was 20 kg. and 220 gram ganja that was recovered from the applicant. Out of which, 200 gram sample was sent for analysis. It is a case of chance recovery. 6. It is a stage of bail. Much of the discussion is not expected of. Arguments are being appreciated with the caveat that any observation made in this order shall have no bearing at any subsequent stage of the trial or in any other proceedings. 7. According to the prosecution, both the applicant and the co-accused had separate ganja with them. The co-accused had less than commercial quantity of ganja, whereas, the applicant who was driving the vehicle has ganja which is more than commercial quantity. 8. Having considered, this Court is of the view that there is no ground to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application deserves to be rejected. 9. The bail application is rejected.