JUDGMENT : Ajay Mohan Goel, J. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has primarily prayed for the following reliefs:- i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to make the compliance of Rule 14(b)(c) and(d) of the Himachal Pradesh Nautor Land Rules, 1968, with regard to correctness Tatima Sajra (Field Map) as well as with regard to correctness of Khasra Nos. shown on spot on which possession was delivered to grandfather of the petitioner about 60 years back under this Scheme and which spot has been cultivated and inhabited by the petitioner till the date without any variation on the spot till the date on land has been the prepare proper field map of the land situated at revenue village Kando Dugna, Pargana Laghi Kangra, Tehsil Paonta Sahib (now Tehsil Kamrou) District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh which has been show Khasra No. 3640/573 measuring about 2 Bighas 13 Biswas and in Khasra No. 4028/3624 measuring 2 Bighas 7 Biswas and which has been not reflected in field map as per Khasra Numbers and Khasra Numbers which are allotted to petitioner on spot has not been shown in ownership of the present petitioner to the extent of total area of 5 Bighas, although ownership of area has been correctly mentioned i.e. 5 Bighas. ii) That in the event land which has been allotted to the petitioner to the extent of 5 Bighas on the spot by the respondents about 65 years back and where petitioner is presently residing and is having cultivated fields till the date, is recorded in the ownership of the petitioner as respondents is duty bound due to allotment of the same to the petitioner, in that event petitioner is ready to relinquish the area which has been wrongly shown in the name of the petitioner. iii) That respondents are duty bound to update their record by accurately reflecting the possession and ownership of the present petitioner in concerned field map and Khasra Nos. by making necessary inquiry to the same.” 2. Prima facie, the petition is not maintainable for the reason that the petitioner cannot approach this Court for the reliefs being prayed for before firstly approaching the concerned authorities as the High Court cannot be treated as a Post Office. 3. by making necessary inquiry to the same.” 2. Prima facie, the petition is not maintainable for the reason that the petitioner cannot approach this Court for the reliefs being prayed for before firstly approaching the concerned authorities as the High Court cannot be treated as a Post Office. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take up the issue, subject matter of the present petition, before the authority concerned. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. CMP No. 550 and 552 of 2024 4. In view of adjudication of the main writ petition, no orders are required to be passed on these applications and the same are accordingly disposed of.