JUDGMENT : Petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P11 order of the 2nd respondent/Geologist, which rejected petitioner's application for issuance of movement permit and transit passes. The rejection was premised on an interpretation to Rule 14(2) of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 (for short 'K.M.M.C. Rules') to the effect that the exemption granted therein applies only to digging of foundation of buildings; and not for construction of building, as such. On such interpretation, the petitioner was required to produce environmental clearance, vide Ext.P11. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, the petitioner wants to construct six residential villas in the subject property having an extent of one hectare. Harping upon Rule 14(2) of the K.M.M.C. Rules, petitioner applied for movement permit and transit passes, on the premise that, no quarrying permit is required. Learned counsel would submit that, the language employed in Rule 14(2) is “extraction of ordinary earth in connection with the construction and digging of foundation for building that do not require environmental clearance”, which necessarily means that extraction of ordinary earth for the purpose of construction of the building also does not require any quarrying permit, provided the building does not require any environmental clearance. Learned counsel then invited the attention of this Court to the Schedule to E.I.A. notification, 2006, particularly to Clause 8(a), which deals with building and construction projects, to point out that, such building or projects where the total built up area is less than 50000 sq. mts. does not require any environmental clearance. Learned counsel would hasten to add that, the requirement of 50000 has since then been amended to 20000 sq. mts. It is the specific case of the petitioner, which finds recognition in Ext.P11 impugned order, that the total built up area of all the six buildings of the petitioner is less than 12500 sq.mts, wherefore, no environmental clearance is required. In such circumstances, the rejection of petitioner's application for movement permit and transit passes, vide Ext.P11, is illegal, is the submission made by the learned counsel. Learned counsel would also clarify that, the application for movement permit and transit passes was initially rejected vide Ext.P7, against which, the petitioner preferred a review vide Ext.P8. Ext.P11 order rejected the review petition. In such circumstances, the rejection of petitioner's application for movement permit and transit passes, vide Ext.P11, is illegal, is the submission made by the learned counsel. Learned counsel would also clarify that, the application for movement permit and transit passes was initially rejected vide Ext.P7, against which, the petitioner preferred a review vide Ext.P8. Ext.P11 order rejected the review petition. Learned counsel would also submit that, the interpretation sought to be assigned to Rule 14(2), that it applies only to digging of foundation of building is erroneous and misconstrued. Learned counsel would invite the attention of this Court to requirements in amended provision of Rule 14(2) which speaks of plinth area of the ground floor, the open space of the building, dimensioned plan and sectional drawing etc., which would only indicate that Rule 14(2) takes within its sweep construction of building; and not confined to construction of foundation for buildings. 4. Per contra, these submissions were refuted by the learned Government Pleader. Learned Government Pleader would submit so as to sustain Ext.P11 order of the District Geologist. 5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, this Court finds considerable force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Rule 14 of the K.M.M.C. Rules is extracted here below : “14. Quarrying Permit for Ordinary earth – (1) A quarrying permit under these rules shall be obtained for extraction [and transportation] of ordinary earth used for filling or levelling purposes in construction of embankments, roads, railways or building in Form N: (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1), no quarrying permit is required under these rules for the extraction of ordinary earth in connection with the construction and digging of foundations for building that do not require environmental clearance under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Central Act 29 of 1986), if the owner of the land obtained a prior valid building permit from the Local Self Government authorities concerned. In cases where levelling of land involve extraction and transportation of ordinary earth outside the property, authorities who grant building permit under the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2019 and Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 2019, shall ensure that following particulars are provided in the plans submitted by the applicant, namely:- a. precise area proposed for extraction of ordinary earth with demarcation details is provided and that such precise area does not exceed the sum of plinth area of ground floor, the open space around the building as per Building Rules, and the space required for implementing safety provisions, including the driveway. b. dimensioned plan and sectional drawing showing the abutting road level, the levels and depths of cutting at all places in respect of excavations for building construction c. quantity of ordinary earth proposed to be extracted, quantity of ordinary earth proposed to be used for filling and balance quantity of ordinary earth proposed to be transported outside the property, and d. drawings, specifications and details of temporary and permanent protective measures including retaining walls where excavations to a depth of more than 1.5 meters is involved. Provided that, if the proposed building construction site is located in a hilly terrain with steep slopes where excavation of ordinary earth may result in slope failures, the building permit granting authority may insist the applicant to submit a slope stability study report prepared by any reputable agency providing geotechnical investigation services and the decision to grant permit may be taken based on the recommendations provided in the report.” 6. It could be seen from the above that, while Rule 14(1) speaks of the requirement of a quarrying permit for extraction of ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankments, roads, railways or buildings, Rule 14(2) carves out an exception to the above requirement, by stipulating that, no quarrying permit is required for extraction of ordinary earth in connection with the construction and digging of foundations for building that do not require environmental clearance under the Environmental Protection Act, 1986. If one looks at the plain literal meaning of the language employed, that is to say, construction and digging of foundation for building, it is possible to conclude that what is intended is the digging of foundation. If one looks at the plain literal meaning of the language employed, that is to say, construction and digging of foundation for building, it is possible to conclude that what is intended is the digging of foundation. However, the amended provision with respect to 14(2), as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, speaks of the particulars to be contained in the plans submitted by the applicant, that is to say, the plinth area of the ground floor, the open space, the space required for implementing safety provisions, the dimensioned plan and sectional drawing showing abutting road level, the drawing specifications and details of temporary and permanent protective measures, including retaining walls etc. Reference to the above parameters is a sure indicator that Rule 14(2) contemplates construction of building and the same is not confined to construction and digging of foundations for buildings. The interpretation sought to be assigned to Rule 14(2) in K.M.M.C. Rules cannot therefore be sustained. 7. In the light of the above discussion, this Writ Petition succeeds. Exts. P7 and P11 cannot be sustained and the same are hereby set aside. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent/Geologist to issue movement permit and transit passes to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, provided the application is otherwise in accord with the requirements under Rule 14(2) of the K.M.M.C. Rules. The petitioner will place a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. The Writ Petition (Civil) is disposed of as above.