ORDER : Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash all proceedings against them. 2. Petitioners herein are accused No.1 to 9 in C.C.No.653/2018 on the files of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court-I, Tirur, arising out of Crime No.106/2018 of Valanchery Police Station, Malappuram registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147 and 153 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The second respondent is the de facto complainant. 3. According to the prosecution, accused had on 16.04.2018 formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and committed illegal acts including destruction of banners that were erected in relation to the festival of temple, and thereby committed the offences alleged. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings. 6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [ (2012) 10 SCC 303 ], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [ (2014) 6 SCC 466 ] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [ (2014) 9 SCC 653 ]. 7. I have perused Annexure-A3 affidavit filed by the second respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and de facto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility. 8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.653/2018 on the files of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court-I, Tirur, are quashed. This Crl.M.C. is allowed as above.