Shyam Ji Agnihotri v. State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U. P. Lko.
2024-04-01
NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, VIVEK CHAUDHARY
body2024
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Since the point involved in the present writ petition is trivial in nature, so the present writ petition is being heard and decided at the admission stage. 3. Notice to the respondent no.3 is dispensed with. 4. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 04.03.2024 lodged by respondent no.3, registered as F.I.R./Case Crime No.0164/2024, under Sections 406, 452, 147, 504, and 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali Sadar, District-Kheri. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent-State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioners, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 41-A Cr.P.C. shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 : Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another. 6. Considering the Stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra).