JUDGMENT : Yogendra Kumar Purohit, J. 01- ;kph dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] vkcwioZr ds le{k yafcr LVsV cuke eksguyky] uEcjh QkStnkjh 132@2001 ds ekeys esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 19-09-2017 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- la{ksi esa ekeys ds rF; bl izdkj ls gSa fd ;kph ds fo:) vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] vkcwioZr ds le{k ,d ifjokn vUrxZr /kkjk 07@16 [kk| vifeJ.k fuokj.k vf/kfu;e esa fnukad 13-08-2001 dks izLrqr gksus ij izdj.k esa izlaKku fy;k tkdj vfHk;qDr dks tfj, leu ryc fd;k x;k] vfHk;qDr dh rych gksus ij vfHk;qDr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa fnukad 16-05-2016 dks mifLFkr gqvk vkSj viuh tekur djokbZ vkSj mlh jkst+ izkFkZuk&i= vUrxZr /kkjk 13¼2½ [kk| vifeJ.k fuokj.k vf/kfu;e esa izLrqr dj f}rh; lSEiy dks dsUnzh; [kk| iz;ksx'kkyk esa fHktok, tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA ftl ij MkW;jsDVj] lh-,Q-,y-] iwuk dks fnukad 06-09- 2016 dks f}rh; lSEiy ^^vkbZlØhe** dks VsLV ds fy, Hkstk x;k] ftl ij Form II ds rgr Certificate of analysis by the Central Food Laboratory izkIr gqvk] ftlesa ;g vafdr fd;k x;k fd lSEiy ,ukfyfll ;ksX; ugha gS vkSj mldk dkj.k fuEukuqlkj fy[kk x;k "The Sample is blackened and deteriorated, hence unfit for analysis." bl fjiksVZ ds i'pkr ;kph dh vksj ls izkFkZuk&i= vUrxZr /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds rgr fnukad 03-06-2017 dks izLrqr dj vfHk;qDr dks fMLpktZ fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dh] ftldk tokc ifjoknh i{k dh vksj ls fn;k x;kA fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk cgl lquh tkdj vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 19-09-2017 ikfjr djrs gq, ;kph dk izkFkZuk&i= vUrxZr /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV [kkfjt fd;k x;k] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj gh ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 3- ;kph dh vksj ls viuh ;kfpdk esa ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds rgr f}rh; lSEiy tkap ;ksX; ugha ik;k x;k] ftlls /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds rgr egRoiw.kZ vf/kdkj tks ;kph dks gkfly Fkk] ftldk izHkko vkKkid gSA ;kph bl vf/kdkj dk iz;ksx ugha dj ldk] bl vk/kkj ij v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k yafcr dk;Zokgh Mªksi fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA ;kph dh vksj ls ;g fuosnu fd;k fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa ifjoknh i{k ds tokc esa xyr vafdr fd;k gS fd ifCyd gSYFk yscksjsVªh dh fjiksVZ ifjokn is'k djus ls iwoZ ;kph dks Hksth xbZ Fkh] ;kph us /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds vf/kdkjksa dk iz;ksx 10 fnu ds Hkhrj ugha fd;k] tcfd dksbZ fjiksVZ ifjokn ls iwoZ ;kph dks ugha Hksth xbZA fjiksVZ Hksts tkus ckcr dksbZ jlhn ;k ,DuksystesaV ifjokn ds lkFk is'k ugha fd;k x;kA var esa fofHkUu vk/kkj of.kZr djrs gq, fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k ;kph ds fo:) yafcr fu;fer QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k 132@2001 LVsV cuke eksguyky dh dk;Zokgh o vkns'k fnukad 19-09-2017 dks fujLr dj ;kph dks fMLpktZ djus dk fuosnu fd;kA 4- cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dh vksj ls viuh ;kfpdk esa of.kZr rF;ksa dks rdksZa ds :i esa izLrqr djrs gq, ;kph dks fMLpktZ fd, tkus o dk;Zokgh fujLr fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dh vkSj viuh rdksZa ds leFkZu esa bl U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar egs'k ;kno oxSjk cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3402/2017 fu.kZ; fnukad 07-02-2018 dh vksj /;ku vkdf"kZr fd;k vkSj ;g fuosnu fd;k fd /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV dk izko/kku vkKkid izko/kku gS vkSj nsjh ls lSEiy Hksts tkus ls lh-,Q-,y- ls tkap ugha gks ikbZA bl vk/kkj ij izdj.k esa vfHk;qDr dks fMLpktZ fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA 5- fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk bldk l[r fojks/k djrs gq, ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA 6- eSaus mijksDr rdksZa ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk lko/kkuhiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA 7- loZizFke bl laca/k esa fof/kd fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k tk jgk gSA /kkjk 13¼1½ ls 13¼5½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV fuEukuqlkj gS%& 13. Report of Public Analyst .- [(1) The Public Analyst shall deliver, in such form as may be prescribed, a report to the Local (Health) Authority of the result of the analysis of any article of food submitted to him for analysis.] (2)On receipt of the report of the result of the analysis under sub-section (1) to the effect that the article of food is adulterated, the Local (Health) Authority shall, after the institution of prosecution against the persons from whom the sample of the article of food was taken and the person, if any, whose name, address and other particulars have been disclosed under section 14-A, forward, in such manner as may be prescribed, a copy of the report of the result of the analysis to such person or persons, as the case may be, informing such person or persons that if it is so desired, either or both of them may make an application to the Court within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of the copy of the report to get the sample of the article of food kept by the Local (Health) Authority analysed by the Central Food Laboratory. (2-A) When an application is made to the Court under sub-section (2), the Court shall require the Local (Health) Authority to forward the part or parts of the sample kept by the said Authority and upon such requisition being made, the said Authority shall forward the part or parts of the sample to the Court within a period of five days from the date of receipt of such requisition. (2-B) On receipt of the part or parts of the sample from the Local (Health) Authority under sub-section (2-A), the Court shall first ascertain that the mark and seal or fastening as provided in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 11 are intact and the signature or thumb-impression, as the case may be, is not tampered with, and despatch the part or, as the case may be, one of the parts of the sample under its own seal to the Director of the Central Food Laboratory who shall thereupon send a certificate to the Court in the prescribed form within one month from the date of receipt of the part of the sample specifying the result of the analysis. (2-C) Where two parts of the sample have been sent to the Court and only one part of the sample has been sent by the Court to the Director of the Central Food Laboratory under sub-section (2-B), the Court shall, as soon as practicable, return the remaining part to the Local (Health) Authority and that Authority shall destroy that part after the certificate from the Director of the Central Food Laboratory has been received by the Court:Provided that where the part of the sample sent by the Court to the Director of the Central Food Laboratory is lost or damaged, the Court shall require the Local (Health) Authority to forward the part of the sample, if any, retained by it to the Court and on receipt thereof, the Court shall proceed in the manner provided in sub-section (2-B). (2-D) Until the receipt of the certificate of the result of the analysis from the Director of the Central Food Laboratory, the Court shall not continue with the proceedings pending before it in relation to the prosecution. (2-E) If, after considering the report, if any, of the Food Inspector or otherwise, the Local (Health) Authority is of the opinion that the report delivered by the public analyst under sub-section (1) is erroneous, the said Authority shall forward one of the parts of the sample kept by it to any other public analyst for analysis and if the report of the result of the analysis of that part of the sample by that other public analyst is to the effect that the article of food is adulterated, the provisions of sub-sections (2) to (2-D) shall, so far as may be, apply. (3)The certificate issued by the Director of the Central Food Laboratory [under sub-section (2-B)] [Substituted by Act 34 of 1976, Section 10, for " under sub-Section (2)" (w.e.f. 1-4-1976).] shall supersede the report given by the public analyst under sub-section (1). (4)Where a certificate obtained from the Director of the Central Food Laboratory [under sub-section (2- B)] [Substituted by Act 34 of 1976, Section 10, for " under sub-Section (2)" (w.e.f. 1-4-1976). ] is produced in any proceeding under this act, or under sections 272 to 276 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), it shall not be necessary in such proceeding to produce any part of the sample of food taken for analysis. ] is produced in any proceeding under this act, or under sections 272 to 276 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), it shall not be necessary in such proceeding to produce any part of the sample of food taken for analysis. (5)Any document purporting to be a report signed by a public analyst, unless it has been superseded under sub-section (3), or any document purporting to be a certificate signed by the Director of the Central Food Laboratory may be used as evidence of the facts stated therein in any proceeding under this Act or under sections 272 to 276 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860): [Provided that any document purporting to be a certificate signed by the Director of the Central Food Laboratory not being a certificate with respect to the analysis of the part of the sample of any article of food referred to in the proviso to sub-section (1-A) of section 16 shall be final and conclusive evidence of the facts stated therein.] [Substituted by Act 34 of 1976, Section 10, for the proviso (w.e.f. 1-4-1976).] [Explanation .-In this section, and in clause (f) of sub-section (1) of section 16, "Director of the Central Food Laboratory" shall include the officer for the time being in charge of any Food Laboratory (by whatever designation he is known) recognised by the Central Government for the purposes of this section.] [Inserted by Act 34 fo 1976, Section 10 (w.e.f.1-3- 1965).] 08- fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar egs'k ;kno oxSjk ¼iwoksZDr½ ds ekeys esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fxjh'k HkkbZ n;k HkkbZ lkg cuke lh-lh- tkuh o vU; ¼2009½15 ,l-lh-lh- 64 ds vk/kkj ij ;g fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k x;k fd /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds rgr izkFkZuk&i= is'k djus ds i'pkr lh-,Q-,y- esa 'kh?kz tkap gsrq Hkstk tkuk pkfg,A N% o"kZ rd f}rh; lSEiy ugha Hkstk tkus ls /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds rgr vfHk;qDr ds vf/kdkj izHkkfor gksrs gSa vkSj lh-,Q-,y- esa Hkstus esa dh xbZ nsjh ds vk/kkj ij gh dk;Zokgh fujLr dj nh xbZA 9- bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk foJke dqekor cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku] S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3301/2015, fu.kZ; fnukad 09-12-2015 ds ekeys esa lh-,Q-,y- dh fjiksVZ esa ;g vk;k fd "The Sample is blackended and deteriorated, hence unfit for analysis." bl fjiksVZ ds i'pkr vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls bl U;k;ky; esa /kkjk 482 lhvkj-ih-lh- dh dk;Zokgh dh xbZ FkhA ftl ij bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk vius fu.kZ; esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Ghisa Ram AIR 1967 SC 970 . o bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB ds vU; fu.kZ;ksa ij fopkj dj ;g fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k x;k fd /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds rgr vfHk;qDr dks ifCyd ,ukfyLV dh fjiksVZ dks pqukSrh djus dk vf/kdkj vkKkid gS vkSj bl ekeys esa lh-,Q-,y- dh fjiksVZ dks ns[krs gq, izdj.k dks yafcr j[ks tkuk gross abuse of process of law gksuk ekurs gq, QkStnkjh izdj.k dh dk;Zokgh dks fujLr dj fn;k x;kA 10- ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar NARAYANA PRASAD SAHU Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1312/ 2021, vkns'k fnukad 29-10-2021 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds iwoZ U;kf;d n`"Vkar Vijendra vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh AIR 2019 SC 4351 ij fopkj djrs gq, 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds laca/k esa iSjk la[;k 5 ls 8 esa fuEukuqlkj foospu dj ;g fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd fu;e 9 ¼ch½ ds eqrkfcd ifjokn is'k djus ds 10 fnu ds Hkhrj ifCyd ,ukfyLV dh fjiksVZ vfHk;qDr dks Hksth tkuh pkfg, vkSj ml fjiksVZ dks dsoy tfj, Mkd Hkst nsuk gh i;kZIr ugha gS vfHk;qDr dks fjiksVZ feyuk vko';d gSA fu;e 9¼ch½ esa jftLVMZ Mkd ;k O;fDr'k% 'kCn gksus ls jftLVMZ Mkd ;fn vfHk;qDr dks ugha feyrh gS rks fjiksVZ O;fDr'k% nsuh pkfg,%& "(5) -------- Under sub-section (2) of Section 13, it is mandatory for the Local(Health) Authority to forward a copy of the report of the Public Analyst to the person from whom the sample of the food has been taken in such a manner as may be prescribed. Further mandate of subsection (2) of Section 13 is that a person to whom the report is forwarded should be informed that if it is so desired, he can make an application to the Court within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of the copy of the report to get the sample analysed by Central Food Laboratory. The report is required to be forwarded after institution of prosecution against the person from whom the sample of the article of food was taken. Apart from the right of the accused to contend that the report is not correct, he has right to exercise an option of sending the sample to Central Food Laboratory for analysis by making an application to the Court within ten days from the date of receipt of the report. Apart from the right of the accused to contend that the report is not correct, he has right to exercise an option of sending the sample to Central Food Laboratory for analysis by making an application to the Court within ten days from the date of receipt of the report. If a copy of the report of the Public Analyst is not delivered to the accused, his right under subsection (2) of Section 13 of praying for sending the sample to the Central Food Laboratory will be defeated. Consequently, his right to challenge the report will be defeated. His right to defend himself will be adversely affected. This Court in the case of Vijendra (supra) held that mere dispatch of the report to the accused is not a sufficient compliance with the requirement of subsection (2) of Section 13 and the report must be served on the accused. 6. Perusal of the judgments of the learned Magistrate and Sessions Court show that the clerk who dispatched the report was examined by the prosecution. Though the prosecution has relied upon the remarks made by the Postman on the postal envelope, the Postman who has allegedly made the said remarks was admittedly not examined by the prosecution. 7. Rule 9B of the said Rules reads thus:- “9B. Though the prosecution has relied upon the remarks made by the Postman on the postal envelope, the Postman who has allegedly made the said remarks was admittedly not examined by the prosecution. 7. Rule 9B of the said Rules reads thus:- “9B. Local (Health) authority to send report to person concerned--The Local (Health) Authority shall [within a period of ten days] after the institution of prosecution forward a copy of the report of the result of analysis in Form III delivered to him under sub-rule (3) of rule 7, by registered post or by hand, as may be appropriate, to the person from whom the sample of the article was taken by the food inspector, and simultaneously also to the person, if any, whose name, address and other particulars have been disclosed under section 14A of the Act: Provided that where the sample conforms to the provisions of the Act or the rules made thereunder, and no prosecution is intended under sub-section (2), or no action is intended under sub-section (2E)n of section 13 of the Act, the Local (Health) Authority shall intimate the result to the Vendor from whom the sample has been taken and also to the person, whose name, address and other particulars have been disclosed under section 14A of the Act, within 10 days from the receipt of the report from the Public Analyst.” More than one mode was prescribed by Rule 9B for serving the report of Public Analyst on the accused. In the present case, after the postal packet was returned, not even an attempt was made to personally serve the report on the appellant. 8. On the basis of endorsements of the Postman appearing on the postal envelope containing the report, the High Court has recorded a finding of refusal on the part of the appellant to accept the report. The said finding is obvious erroneous as the endorsements on the postal envelope were not proved by examining the Postman. Moreover, the High Court has glossed over the mandatory requirement under sub- section (2) of Section 13 of serving a copy of the report on the accused. Evidence adduced by the prosecution was of mere dispatch of the report. Hence, the mandatory requirement of sub-section (2) of Section 13 was not complied with. Moreover, the High Court has glossed over the mandatory requirement under sub- section (2) of Section 13 of serving a copy of the report on the accused. Evidence adduced by the prosecution was of mere dispatch of the report. Hence, the mandatory requirement of sub-section (2) of Section 13 was not complied with. Therefore, the conviction and sentence of the appellant cannot be sustained." 11- ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Ghisa Ram AIR 1967 SC 970 . Evidence adduced by the prosecution was of mere dispatch of the report. Hence, the mandatory requirement of sub-section (2) of Section 13 was not complied with. Therefore, the conviction and sentence of the appellant cannot be sustained." 11- ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Ghisa Ram AIR 1967 SC 970 . dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA bl ekeys esa Hkh lh-,Q-,y- fjiksVZ ryc dh xbZ Fkh] ftl ij ;g fjiksVZ vkbZ fd "The Sample of curd sent to him had become highly decomposed and no analysis of it was possible." ftl ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDr dks nks"keqDr dj fn;k x;k FkkA vihy esa Hkh bl fu.kZ; dks ;FkkoFk j[kk x;k] ftl ij ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; esa dh xbZ vihy esa /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds izko/kkuksa ij fopkj fd;k x;k vkSj ;g Li"V fd;k fd vfHk;kstu dh otg ls ;fn lSEiy nsjh ls Hkstk x;k vkSj lh-,Q-,y- ls tkap ugha gks ikbZ rks mldk ykHk vfHk;qDr dks feysxk vkSj nks"keqfDr ds fu.kZ; dh iqf"V bl ekeys esa dh xbZA 12- iwoZ esa of.kZr fof/kd fLFkfr ls ;g Li"V gS fd ;fn vfHk;qDr dh ykijokgh ls f}rh; lSEiy tkap gsrq Hksts tkus eas nsjh u gqbZ gks rks vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 7@16 ih-,Q-,- ,DV esa nks"kh ugha Bgjk;k tk ldrkA mDr fof/kd fLFkfr dks en~nstj j[krs gq, gLrxr ekeys ij fopkj fd;k x;kA 13- fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vius vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 19-09-2017 esa vfHk;kstu i{k ds tokc dk mYys[k fd;k x;k gS ftlesa ;g vafdr fd;k x;k gS fd bLrxklk is'k djus ls iwoZ fu;ekuqlkj eqfYte dks ,Q-,y-,yfjiksVZ dh dkWih Hksth xbZ] ftlesa fu;ekuqlkj eqfYte dks 10 fnu esa /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV dk izkFkZuk&i= is'k djus dk vf/kdkj Fkk fdarq fu;r 10 fnu dh vof/k esa eqfYte }kjk /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV dk izkFkZuk&i= is'k ugha fd;k x;k rFkk bLrxklk is'k gksus dh frfFk ds 15 o"kZ ckn eqfYte U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gqvk gS] bl laca/k esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds fjdkWMZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA 14- tks ifjokn is'k fd;k x;k] mlesa ;g vafdr ugha fd;k x;k gS fd ifjokn is'k djus ls iwoZ ifCyd ,ukfyLV dh fjiksVZ vfHk;qDr&;kph dks Hksth xbZ gksA ifjokn fizUVsM izQksekZ ij [kkyh LFkku dks Hkjdj is'k fd;k x;k gS tks tokc v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa ;kph ds izkFkZuk&i= dk ifjoknh i{k dh vksj ls izLrqr fd;k x;k] mlesa vo'; ;g vk/kkj fy;k x;k ijarq ifjokn is'k djus ls iwoZ ;k ifjokn U;k;ky; esa izLrqr djus ds i'pkr fu;e 9¼ch½ ds vuqlkj 10 fnu ds Hkhrj eqLrxhl i{k dh vksj ls ifCyd ,ukfyLV dh fjiksVZ vfHk;qDr&;kph dks Hksts tkus ckcr i= dh izfr i=koyh ij izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gSA u gh dksbZ jlhn gh is'k dh xbZ gS]ifjokn ds lkFk tks nLrkost is'k fd, x,] ml lwph esa Hkh ,slk dksbZ i= ;kph dks fn, tkus dk mYys[k ugha gS u gh dksbZ jlhn dk mYys[k gSA 15- ;kph ds izkFkZuk&i= ds tokc ds lkFk Hkh rFkkdfFkr dksbZ i= ftlds lkFk ifCyd ,ukfyLV dh fjiksVZ ;kph vfHk;qDr dks Hksth xbZ gks] og is'k ugha fd;k x;k vkSj u gh fdlh izdkj dh ifCyd ,ukfyLV fjiksVZ ;kph dks fn, tkus ckcr jlhn gh i=koyh ij is'k dh xbZA ,slh voLFkk esa izFken`"V;k gh ;g ugha ekuk tk ldrk fd ifCyd ,ukfyLV dh fjiksVZ ifjokn is'k djus ls iwoZ ;k ifjokn is'k djus ds i'pkr fu;ekuqlkj nl fnu esa ;kph dks Hksth xbZ gksA bl ekeys esa ifjokn U;k;ky; esa fnukad 13-08-2001 dks izLrqr fd;k x;k] ftlesa tfj, leu vfHk;qDr dks ryc fd;k x;k vkSj fnukad 23-11-2006 rd tfj, leu ryc fd;k x;k vkSj fnukad 23-11-2016 dks tekurh okj.V 5000@& :i;s ls rych dk vkns'k fn;k x;kA fnukad 19-01-2016 ds QnZ vgdke ds eqrkfcd vfHk;qDr dk tekurh okj.V ckn rkehy izkIr gksus o /kkjk 446 dh dk;Zokgh vyx ls [kksys tkus dk mYys[k fd;k vkSj fxjQ~rkjh okj.V ls rych tkjh djus dk vkns'k fn;k x;kA rRi'pkr fnukad 16-05-2016 dks vfHk;qDr U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gqvk vkSj izkFkZuk&i= is'k dj viuh tekur djokbZ vkSj mlh jkst+ /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds rgr f}rh; lSEiy tkap gsrq fHktok, tkus ckcr vkosnu fd;kA fnukad 16-05-2016 ls iwoZ vfHk;qDr dks ifCyd ,ukfyLV fjiksVZ dh tkudkjh gksuk laHko ugha FkkA ifCyd ,ukfyLV dh fjiksVZ U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksus ij gqbZ tkudkjh ij mlh jkst+ vkosnu&i= is'k dj fn;k x;kA 16- v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vius vk{ksfir vkns'k esa ifjoknh ds tokc dk mYys[k fd;k gS ftlesa ;g vafdr fd;k x;k gS fd tekurh okj.V rkehy gksus ds ckotwn 5 ekg ckn fnukad 16-05-2016 dks /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV dk izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr fd;k x;kA tks f}rh; lSEiy tkap gsrq Hkstus esa nsjh Lo;a eqfYte ds Lrj ij gqbZ gSA bl laca/k esa tekurh okj.V rkehy gksuk eku Hkh fy;k tkos rks mlls fdl ekeys ls lacaf/kr tekurh okj.V Fkk vkSj ifCyd ,ukfyLV dh fjiksVZ vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkbZ gS] bldh tkudkjh vfHk;qDr dks gks xbZ gks] ;g ekuus dh drbZ vfHk/kkj.kk ugha dh tk ldrhA vfHk;qDr tc loZizFke fnukad 16-05-2016 dks mifLFkr vk;k] mlh jkst gh ifCyd ,ukfyLV dh fjiksVZ dh tkudkjh gksuk bl ekeys esa Li"V gS vkSj mlh jkst+ /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds rgr vkosnu i= vfHk;qDr&;kph }kjk is'k dj fn;k x;kA 17- ,slh voLFkk esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa ifjoknh i{k ds }kjk vius tokc esa tekurh okj.V dh rkehy gks tkus ls vfHk;qDr dh otg ls nsjh gksus dk tks vk/kkj fy;k x;k gS og Hkh drbZ pyus ;ksX; ugha gSA bl ekeys esa vfHk;qDr dh otg ls f}rh; lSEiy Hkstus esa nsjh gksuk drbZ izrhr ugha gksrk gSA bl ekeys esa vfHk;kstu i{k dh otg ls gh f}rh; lSEiy lh-,Q-,y- esa Hksts tkus esa nsjh gksuk Li"V gSA 18- fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vius vk{ksfir vkns'k esa bl LVst ij izdj.k esa uewuk Hkstus esa gq, foyEc ckcr fu/kkZfjr fd;k tkuk lehphu ugha gksuk ekurs gq, izdj.k ds vafre izØe ij bl rF; dks fu/kkZfjr fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr le>s tkus dk mYys[k djrs gq, izkFkZuk&i= [kkfjt dj fn;k x;kA 19- iwoZ eas izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa esa fd, x, foospu ds en~nsutj tc Li"Vr;k bl U;k;ky; ds le{k rF; ekStwn gS fd izdj.k esa ifjokn is'k djus ls iwoZ vFkok i'pkr ifCyd ,ukfyLV dh fjiksVZ vfHk;qDr&;kph dks ugha Hksth xbZ vkSj vfHk;qDr&;kph loZizFke fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k fnukad 16-05-2016 dks mifLFkr gqvk vkSj mlh jkst+ tekur djokdj /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds rgr vkosnu is'k fd;k x;k vkSj f}rh; lSEiy dh tkap djok, tkus dh izkFkZuk dh vkSj lh-,Q-,y- dh fjiksVZ ["The Sample is blackened and deteriorated, hence unfit for analysis."] ds eqrkfcd lSEiy tkap ;ksX; ugha ik;k x;kA ,slh voLFkk esa /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds rgr vfHk;qDr ds egRoiw.kZ vf/kdkj ls vfHk;qDr&;kph oafpr gqvk gS vkSj viuk cpko djus esa ;kph vlQy jgk gSA 20- ,slh voLFkk esa /kkjk 13¼2½ ih-,Q-,- ,DV ds vkKkid izko/kkuksa dks en~nsutj j[krs gq, bl ekeys esa fopkj.k dks yafcr j[kk tkuk gross abuse of process of law gksuk Li"V gSA ,slh voLFkk esa blh LVst ij ;kph ds fo:) yafcr /kkjk 7@16 ih-,Q-,- ,DV dh dk;Zokgh fujLr fd;k tkuk fof/klEer izrhr gksrk gS vkSj ;kph dh ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA 21- vr% ;kph eksguyky dh ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 482 lhvkj-ih-lh- Lohdkj dh tkdj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukafdr 19-09-2017 dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ;kph ds fo:) U;k;ky; vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] vkcwioZr esa yafcr fu;fer QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k 132@2001 LVsV cuke eksguyky] dh dk;Zokgh fujLr dh tkrh gS vkSj vfHk;qDr&;kph dks fMLpktZ fd;k tkrk gSA 22- ;kfpdk ds lkFk izLrqr LFkxu izkFkZuk&i= Hkh fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA