Order : ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J. 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Office in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5406/2025, stands waived. 2. By way of filing these petitions, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 09.10.2024 passed by the Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA at New Delhi. 3. The counsel for the parties have withdrawn their prayer to the extent of challenge to the aforesaid order passed by the Appellate Tribunal. They have confined their prayer seeking directions for disposal of their representations regarding crystallization of their rights in regard to their respective dwelling units in a time bound manner. 4. After arguing for some time, learned counsels for the petitioners jointly submit that a liberty be granted to the petitioners to approach the authorities concerned for crystallization of their rights, as they are in possession of the property in question on the basis of agreement to sell. Counsels submits that in identical petitions bearing S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.5241/2025 and 3998/2025, the co- petitioners submitted representations for the same relief and those petitions have been disposed of by issuing directions to the authorities concerned to decide their representations in accordance with law. Counsel submits that in the instant case also, the same liberty be granted to the petitioners. 5. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and without entering into the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of all these writ petitions granting liberty to the petitioners to file representation(s) for crystallization of their rights. 6. In case, such representation(s) is submitted by the petitioners within a period from one week from today, it is expected form the authority concerned to decide the same expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of five weeks thereafter. 7. For a period of further six weeks, the interim protection awarded to the petitioners with respect to their possession on the property in question, as per the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal, shall continue. 8. The stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 9. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/direction to the respondent/Appellate Court to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. The same would be decided by them strictly in accordance with law.