Research › Search › Judgment

Andhra High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 1092 (AP)

Maddala Sreenivasulu, S/o. M. Kondaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. BY Principal Secretary To Government

2025-10-07

V.SUJATHA

body2025
ORDER : V. SUJATHA, J. The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the bill amounts admittedly due to the petitioner despite successful completion of work in terms of the Agreement No.73 SE/2017-18 dated 27.09.2017 with the Measurement Book (M-Book) No.2154-B, for the works executed by the petitioner with the total cost of Rs.7,98,182/- under the 'Neeru Chettu' program, approved for payment and entered in the CFMS (Comprehensive Financial Management System), even after completion of defect liability period and inspite of repeated requests, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust enrichment, violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, apart from being contrary to the orders of this Honble Court issued from time to time and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith pay the approved amounts payable to the petitioner in respect of the works executed by the petitioner under the aforesaid agreements, along with interest accrued on the said amounts from the due date till the date of payment and pass…” 2. Today when the writ petition came up for hearing, Mr. V. Anil Kumar, learned counsel representing Mr. T. Venu Gopal, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that as the amounts payable to the petitioner have already been paid pending the writ petition, no further orders are required in the writ petition. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.