ORDER : B. KRISHNA MOHAN, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and the learned  Standing Counsel for the 5th respondent. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in taking away the assigned land of the petitioner for an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.402/1 of Pudicherla Village, Orvakal Mandal, Kurnool District, without adherence to the procedure established by law and without formal resumption either, that too without payment of compensation to the petitioner ostensibly at the behest of the 5th respondent. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is squarely covered by the order of this court in W.P. No.25652 of 2021 dated 28.02.2024. 4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 disputes the same stating that, in that case there was an impugned endorsement of the 3rd respondent in respect of the subject land therein and admittedly the D-form patas were issued in favour of the petitioners and also their names were mutated in the revenue records. But in this case there is no such endorsement against the petitioner and the D-form patta claimed by the petitioner is in dispute. 5. The learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter of the 4th respondent submits that the government issued G.O. for alienation of government lands to an extent of 7214.87 acres available in 11 villages of Orvakal Mandal for the establishment of Mega Industrial Park and the same was alienated to the APIIC by the government vide G.O.Ms.No.442, Revenue (ASSN.V) Department, dated 27.09.2016 and the details are as follows: 6. As per the G.O. the Collector & District Magistrate, Kurnool vide proceedings dated 30.04.2017 has ordered for handing over of the land to an extent of Ac.7214.87 cents in favour of APIIC. Hence the land was handed over to the APIIC by the then Tahsildar, Orvakal Mandal vide proceedings dated 04.07.2017. The writ petitioner’s subject lands are also part and parcel of the said land. Since then the said land was in the possession of APIIC and mutation was affected in the name of APIIC in the revenue records on 27.06.2019 by the then Tahsildar, Orvakal. 7. The writ petitioner’s subject lands are also part and parcel of the said land. Since then the said land was in the possession of APIIC and mutation was affected in the name of APIIC in the revenue records on 27.06.2019 by the then Tahsildar, Orvakal. 7. As seen from the Assignment Register there is no record regarding the issuance of D-form patta said to have been issued to the petitioner in the year 2010 for Sy.No.402/1 to an extent of 3.00 acres of Pudicherla Village of Orvakal Mandal. Since the petitioner’s name was not found in the revenue records like manual adangals and even online web land adangals, the D-form patta and pass book mentioned with 1-B Khata No.866 are not correct. There are no records in his favour. In fact the pattadar pass book with Khata No.866 issued to Pujari Hussainaiah S/o Gokari and Khata was also deleted on 22.02.2017 due to transactions, deaths etc. So Khata No.866 shown by the petitioner is a deleted khata number. 8. As seen in the manual adangal for the year 2010, 2011 and 2012 available in the record room, the petitioner’s name was not mutated in them. At the time of survey, the land was vacant and the possession was handed over to APIIC following the due procedure. 9. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to approach the 2nd respondent for the payment of compensation if any for the subject land by enclosing all the necessary documents in support of his claim within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. On receipt of the same, the 2nd respondent shall consider and dispose of the said representation of the petitioner if any strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioner, 5th respondent and others concerned and upon verification of the records, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period four (4) months thereafter. 10. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.