ORDER : 1. The appellant in C.A.No.4338 of 2025 lays challenge to the judgment and order dated 17.12.2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in C.R. No.4263 of 2005, titled “Amrik Singh Chana vs. M/s. Calico Textiles, Faridabad”. 2. We are of the considered view that no interference is warranted, as it is a well-reasoned judgment rendered by the High Court in dismissing the Revision Petition(s) preferred by the appellant(s)/landlord(s). 3. The Rent Controller dismissed the petition(s) filed by the appellant(s), holding that the appellant(s) had failed to establish that the premises in question were required for his/their bona fide use and that the respondents had ceased to occupy the premises for a continuous period of four months. Also, that the respondents had failed to pay the rent for the demised premises, respectively held by them for the period in question. 4. The High Court, in the impugned judgment, has extensively dealt with and interpreted the relevant statutory provisions, and appreciated the evidence led by the parties. 5. In view of the same, the appeals along with the connected Special Leave Petition, are disposed of. 6. However, it is clarified that should the appellant(s) choose to file any fresh petition, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law. 7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.