JUDGMENT : Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J. Learned counsel parties are present. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant in F.A. No. 367 of 2018 has submitted that pursuant to order dated 18.07.2025, he has received no instructions with regard to out of court settlement of the proposal of the claimants. 3. At this, the learned counsel for the claimants has submitted that the case has to be decided on merits. I.A. No. 10691 of 2025 in F.A. No. 293 of 2014 4. Learned counsel for the appellants representing the claimants has submitted that this interlocutory application has been filed for substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased appellant nos. 1, 2 and 4 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the interlocutory application. 5. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellant no. 1 died on 01.02.2018, appellant no. 2 died on 10.12.2022 and appellant no. 4 died on 18.12.2015. The learned counsel submits that there has been delay in filing the interlocutory application, but the Union of India as well as the claimants are aggrieved by the same award and he has also submitted that the entitlement and quantification of the claim is yet to be crystalized. He submits that considering this aspect of the matter, the interlocutory application be allowed so that the appeal is ultimately decided on merits. He has also submitted that there are other appellants also on record. 6. The Vakalatnama on behalf of the proposed legal heirs and successors have also been filed along with the interlocutory application. 7. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 8. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case and the fact that the award is under challenge by both the parties in this batch of cases and the matter relates to compensation arising out of land acquisition, I.A. No. 10691 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the petition for substitution is hereby allowed. 9. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to delete the name of the appellant nos. 9. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to delete the name of the appellant nos. 1, 2 and 4 from the cause-title and insert the names of their legal heirs and successors in red ink during the course of the day. 10. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purpose of present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10705 of 2025 in F.A. No. 295 of 2014 11. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1, 3 and 5 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1, 3 and 5 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1, 3 and 5 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 12. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 13. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 14. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10705 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 15. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 16. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10709 of 2025 in F.A. No. 305 of 2014 17. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay of 123 days in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay of 123 days in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 18. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 19. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 20. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10709 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 21. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 22. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10715 of 2025 in F.A. No. 311 of 2014 23. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 24. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 24. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 25. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 26. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10715 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 27. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 28. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10711 of 2025 in F.A. No. 313 of 2014 29. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant No. 1 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant No. 1 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heir and successor of the appellant No. 1 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 30. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 31. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 32. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10711 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 33. 32. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10711 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 33. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 34. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10695 of 2025 in F.A. No. 314 of 2014 35. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant No.1 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant No.1 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heir and successor of the appellant No.1 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 36. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 37. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 38. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10695 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 39. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 40. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10693 of 2025 in F.A. No. 315 of 2014 41. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1 and 6 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. I.A. No. 10693 of 2025 in F.A. No. 315 of 2014 41. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1 and 6 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1 and 6 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1 and 6 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 42. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 43. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 44. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10693 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 45. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 46. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10714 of 2025 in F.A. No. 317 of 2014 47. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1 and 6 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1 and 6 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1 and 6 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 48. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 49. 1 and 6 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 48. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 49. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 50. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10714 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 51. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 52. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10710 of 2025 in F.A. No. 318 of 2014 53. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 54. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 55. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 56. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10710 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 57. 56. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10710 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 57. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 58. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10708 of 2025 in F.A. No. 320 of 2014 59. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant No. 3 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant No. 3 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant No. 3 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 60. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 61. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 62. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10708 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 63. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 64. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10703 of 2025 in F.A. No. 323 of 2014 65. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1 and 6 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. I.A. No. 10703 of 2025 in F.A. No. 323 of 2014 65. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1 and 6 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1 and 6 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1 and 6 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 66. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 67. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 68. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10703 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 69. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 70. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10717 of 2025 in F.A. No. 324 of 2014 71. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1 and 4 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1 and 4 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1 and 4 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 72. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 73. 1 and 4 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 72. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 73. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 74. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10717 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 75. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 76. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10712 of 2025 in F.A. No. 332 of 2014 77. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1 and 5 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1 and 5 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1 and 5 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 78. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 79. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 80. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10712 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 81. 80. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10712 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 81. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 82. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10713 of 2025 in F.A. No. 333 of 2014 83. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1, 6, 7, 9 and 12 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 84. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 85. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 86. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10713 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 87. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 88. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10792 of 2025 in F.A. No. 337 of 2014 89. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 88. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10792 of 2025 in F.A. No. 337 of 2014 89. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1 and 6 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1 and 6 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1 and 6 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 90. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 91. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 92. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10792 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 93. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 94. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10679 of 2025 in F.A. No. 363 of 2014 95. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 2 and 10 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 2 and 10 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 2 and 10 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 96. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 2 and 10 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 2 and 10 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 96. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 97. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 98. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10679 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 99. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 100. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10681 of 2025 in F.A. No. 393 of 2014 101. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of the sole appellant after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of sole appellant has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the sole appellant have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 102. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 103. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 104. 103. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 104. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10681 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 105. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 106. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10680 of 2025 in F.A. No. 410 of 2014 107. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant No.1 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant No.1 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant No.1 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 108. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 109. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 110. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10680 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 111. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 112. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10683 of 2025 in F.A. No. 416 of 2014 113. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 112. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10683 of 2025 in F.A. No. 416 of 2014 113. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of sole appellant after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of the sole appellant has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the sole appellant have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 114. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 115. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 116. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10683 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 117. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 118. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10682 of 2025 in F.A. No. 482 of 2014 119. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant No.1 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant No.1 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant No.1 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 120. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant No.1 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant No.1 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 120. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 121. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 122. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10682 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 123. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 124. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. I.A. No. 10716 of 2025 in F.A. No. 477 of 2018 125. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that this petition has been filed seeking substitution of appellant Nos. 1 and 2 after setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing this interlocutory application. He has submitted that the Vakalatnama on behalf of legal heirs and successors of appellant Nos. 1 and 2 has also been filed along with the interlocutory application and that the details of legal heirs and successors of the appellant Nos. 1 and 2 have been mentioned in paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application. 126. Learned counsel for the respondent Union of India has no serious objection so far as substitution, setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing the present interlocutory application is concerned. 127. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 128. 127. The matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings. The appellants have filed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation and Union of India has also filed appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. 128. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I.A. No. 10716 of 2025 seeking substitution, setting aside abatement and for condonation of delay, if any, in filing the present interlocutory application, is hereby allowed. 129. Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title in red ink during the course of the day. 130. It is made clear that this substitution is only for the purposes of the present appeal and not for any other purpose. F.A. No. 367 of 2018 and analogous cases 131. Learned counsel for the claimants has submitted that in other cases also, interlocutory applications have been filed seeking substitution which are yet to be instituted. 132. At the request of the counsel for the claimants, the matters are directed to be posted on 21 st August 2025 in the supplementary cause-list to be taken up at 02.15 p.m.