Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 175 (HP)

Suresh Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

2025-01-15

BIPIN CHANDER NEGI

body2025
JUDGMENT : Bipin Chander Negi, J. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.36 of 2024 dated 30.11.2024, under Sections 64 and 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, registered at Women Police Station, Dharamshala, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, complainant, who is present in person and have gone through the record. 3. The victim, in the case at hand, is aged about 24 years old. The bail petitioner is aged about 23 years old. The bail petitioner is serving in the Indian Army and is presently posted at RR Rifles-53 at Rahmo, District Pulwama, Jammu and Kashmir. The victim is gainfully employed at Ghumarwin. The victim and the bail petitioner had acquainted with each other over Instagram somewhere in the month of August, 2023. Their acquaintance over the Instagram led to their meeting each other physically, first at Chandigarh and then at Shimla. Subsequently, in December, 2023, as per the prosecution, the bail petitioner had taken the victim to Dharamshala, where they had stayed at a Hotel, wherein, at the pretext of marriage, the bail petitioner is alleged to have indulged in a sexual intercourse with the victim. 4. Thereafter, in the month of February 2024, the sister of the bail petitioner had spoken telephonically with the victim and had invited the victim to visit their home with an intent of acquainting the family of the bail petitioner with the victim. In August 2024, the bail petitioner had called the victim to Kangra, where they had stayed at a Hotel and on the pretext of marriage, he is alleged to have had sexual intercourse with the victim. 5. After the aforesaid, the bail petitioner had stopped taking calls and had blocked the number of the victim. As a consequence whereof, the victim had complained in the Women Police Station, Ghumarwin in this regard. The Police Station, Ghumarwin had asked the victim to meet Child Development Protection Officer (CDPO) one Smt. Ranjana Sharma. The aforesaid CDPO (Ranjana Sharma) had called the bail petitioner and the parents of the bail petitioner. In front of the CDPO, the matter was orally compromised. 6. After the aforesaid compromise, the bail petitioner in the month of September, 2024 had called the victim to Kangra. The aforesaid CDPO (Ranjana Sharma) had called the bail petitioner and the parents of the bail petitioner. In front of the CDPO, the matter was orally compromised. 6. After the aforesaid compromise, the bail petitioner in the month of September, 2024 had called the victim to Kangra. The victim had met the bail petitioner at Kangra from where they both had proceeded to Jammu. At Jammu, they had stayed at a Hotel, wherein it is yet again alleged that inter se the bail petitioner and the victim sexual intercourse had taken place. 7. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the investigation, in the case at hand, is complete. The bail petitioner has been participating and cooperating in the investigation. No recovery is to be effected from the bail petitioner. 8. The victim, in the case at hand, is aged about 24 years old. She is an adult with sound mind. The element of perversion in the alleged offence, taking into account the comparative age of the victim and the accused, can prima facie be ruled out. Whether the consent of the victim, in the case at hand, was obtained by the bail petitioner on a misrepresentation is a question to be determined at trial. One cannot loose sight of the fact that the bail petitioner had told his family of his relationship with the victim. At the behest of the bail petitioner, the sister of the bail petitioner had taken the bail petitioner to his parental house to meet and interact with his parents Other than the aforesaid, in the case at hand, there exists no element of threat, intimidation, violence or brutality. 9. Personal liberty is a very precious fundamental right. The same is to be curtailed only when it becomes imperative, according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case. 10. The object of bail is to secure the attendance of the accused person at his trial by reasonable amount of bail. The object of bail is neither punitive nor preventative. 11. The consequences of pre-trial incarceration are grave. A person presumed innocent is subjected to psychological and physical deprivations of jail. Further, a jailed individual is prevented from contributing to the preparation of his defence. The burden of his detention falls heavily on the innocent members of his family. 12. The object of bail is neither punitive nor preventative. 11. The consequences of pre-trial incarceration are grave. A person presumed innocent is subjected to psychological and physical deprivations of jail. Further, a jailed individual is prevented from contributing to the preparation of his defence. The burden of his detention falls heavily on the innocent members of his family. 12. Nothing unfavourable has been stated in the status report qua the social circumstances of the petitioner whereby it can be made out that the petitioner is likely to betray the confidence, that the Court may place in him to turn out to take justice at the hands of the Court. 13. Petitioner is permanent resident of Village Makrena, Post Office and Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh. The respondent/State has not expressed any apprehension regarding him fleeing from the justice and adversely affecting the trial. In any case, the petitioner can be put to terms for the purposes of safe, secure and unobstructed completion of trial. 14. From the status report, so filed, it is evident that the petitioner does not have criminal antecedents. There is no possibility of flight risk in the case at hand. 15. Accordingly, present petition is allowed. Interim protection dated 04.12.2024 is made absolute, subject to following conditions:- “(i) The petitioner shall join the investigation of the case as and when called for by the Investigating Officer in accordance with law and shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency.; (ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation in any manner whatsoever.; (iii) The petitioners shall not contact the complainant, threaten or browbeat him or to use any pressure tactics in any manner whatsoever.; (iv) The petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court.; (v) The petitioner shall not make any inducement, threat or promise, directly or indirectly, to the Investigating Officer or any person acquainted with the facts of the case to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer; (vi) The petitioner shall attend the trial on every hearing, unless exempted in accordance with law. (vii) The petitioner shall inform the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station about his place of residence during bail and trial. Any change in the same shall also be communicated within two weeks thereafter. (vii) The petitioner shall inform the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station about his place of residence during bail and trial. Any change in the same shall also be communicated within two weeks thereafter. Petitioner shall furnish furnish details of his Aadhar Card, Telephone Number, E-mail, PAN Card, Bank Account Number, if any. 16. In case of violation of any of the terms & conditions of the bail, respondent-State shall be at liberty to move appropriate application for cancellation of the bail. It is made clear that observations made above are only for the purpose of adjudication of instant bail petition and shall not be construed as an opinion on the merits of the matter. Learned trial Court shall decide the matter without being influenced by above observations. 17. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any. Downloaded copy of this judgment is valid for compliance.