ORDER : 1. Learned counsel appearing for respective parties have placed before this Court two orders dated 28.05.2025 & 16.09.2025 passed in pursuance of the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench in Komal Kumawat & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16312/2024) and other connected matters, which reads as follows: “Order dated 28.05.2025 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4828/2025: 1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the petition (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16312/2024) involving identical issue at Jaipur Bench has been dismissed. 2. Accordingly, this petition is also dismissed. Order dated 16.09.2025 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9158/2024: 1. The issue raised in the present writ petition is no longer res integra in view of the decision rendered by Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16312/2024 (Komal Kumawat & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. and connected matters). 2. The Division Bench has dismissed the aforesaid writ petition vide judgment dated 28.05.2025, making the following observations:- “67. Merely, for the reason that Schedule sought to be substituted vide Notification dated 01.09.2023 is silent in respect of manner of relaxation to be granted qua possessing NCIC/CITS certificate, even for the trades where CITS courses are not available, would not invalidate the Notification dated 01.09.2023 for the reason that it goes without saying that O. M. dated 30.06.2023 issued by the Central Government would govern the field, where the State Rules are silent. More so, learned AAG, on instructions, on behalf of the State, has undertaken that the State would also grant relaxation, whenever required, to the candidates where CITS courses are not available for a particular trade or eligible candidates are not otherwise available.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied with the same observations. 4. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition is disposed of, applying the aforesaid observations made in the case of Komal Kumawat (supra). 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.” 2. Since the application of judgment rendered in the case of Komal Kumawat (supra) is not disputed by the parties, the present writ petitions stand disposed of on the same terms. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.