Research › Search › Judgment

Jharkhand High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 1985 (JHR)

Ayodhya Singh, S/o Late Satyadeo Singh v. State of Jharkhand

2025-10-07

ANANDA SEN

body2025
JUDGMENT : ANANDA SEN, J . Heard the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to pay the arrears of salary as per the 5 th , 6 th & 7 th Pay Revision Commission in the Pay-Scale of Rs.12000-420-18300. The petitioner has also prayed for shifting of date of promotion under new CAS. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that the issue is no longer res integra and has already been decided by this Court and affirmed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court wherein the issue regarding two pay-scales of ‘Reader’, has been struck down. It is also been submitted that the aforesaid judgments have already been affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal(Civil) No.11104/2020. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to get the similar relief and the pay-scale which he has claimed. He submits that he has already filed a representation and suffice it would be if the representation of the petitioner is directed to be disposed of in terms of the judgment of this Hon’ble Court and the Hon‘ble Supreme Court. 4. Learned counsel representing the respondents submits that if the petitioner files a representation, his case will be considered and if it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any relief in terms of the judgment of Hon’ble Courts, appropriate order would be passed. 5. In view of the aforesaid submission, I direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh, within a period of four weeks. Upon the receipt of the said representation, the respondent-University will consider the claim of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is entitled for similar benefit as granted to Prashant Kumar Mishra & Ors., pursuant to the order passed in L.P.A. No.22 of 2018, the Registrar, University, will pass an appropriate order and will communicate the same to the respondent-State. 6. The State thereafter will approve the pay-scales as recommended by the respondent-University and thereafter will disburse necessary fund to the respondent-University. The respondent-University in turn will disburse the same to the petitioner. 7. 6. The State thereafter will approve the pay-scales as recommended by the respondent-University and thereafter will disburse necessary fund to the respondent-University. The respondent-University in turn will disburse the same to the petitioner. 7. So far as shifting of date of promotion is concerned, the petitioner is directed to approach respondent No.4 – The Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand, who will consider the claim of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order. 8. If any part of the claim of the petitioner is turned down either by the University or the State, the Authority who is rejecting the claim should communicate the detailed reasons to the petitioner. 9. The entire process should be concluded within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of the representations filed by the petitioner. 10. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition is disposed of.