ORDER : 1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. These are appeals against the acquittal rendered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 324 and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Trial Court rendered a conviction against the present respondents, which has been overturned by the High Court. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant State submitted that the High Court has not considered the evidence of the material witnesses, especially, the eye witnesses. PWs-4 to 8, being the eye-witnesses, have clearly deposed against the respondent(s). The recovery has also been proved. The Trial Court took this into consideration. The conviction by the Trial Court, based on the aforementioned relevant material, has been wrongly overturned by the High Court. 4. We are not inclined to interfere with the well- reasoned judgment of the High Court. The High Court took into consideration all the evidences placed before it and came to the right conclusion, that the genesis of the occurrence has been suppressed, and there are material contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, including the testimony of the eyewitnesses Pws-4 to 8. Apart from the same, the alleged recovery had also been doubted by the High Court, holding that the place of recovery was visited by the Police immediately after the post-mortem of the deceased and preparation of panchnama, and it is only thereafter, at a later point of time, that a recovery was made, pursuant to the statements made under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 by the respondents. 5. In such view of the matter, in the absence of any perversity, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment. 6. The appeals stand dismissed. 7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.