ORDER : (SHAMIM AHMED, J.) 1. Heard Mr.A.P.Muthupandian, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr.F.Deepak, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents 1, 2 & 4 and Mrs.S.Mahalakshmi, learned counsel appearing for the 3 rd Respondent. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed under the Article 226 of the Constitution of India , to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to promote the petitioner's deceased husband Late P. Jayakumar as Head Clerk/Assistant/Executive Officer Grade II with effect from 11.10.2002 retrospectively and on par with his juniors and to accordingly refix his seniority and grant the consequential further promotion to the post of Executive Officer Grade-I with effect from 27.04.2005 and as Selection Grade Executive Officer Grade-I with effect from 20.06.2007, on par with his junior with full service and monetary benefits as per the order of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras dated 22.06.2011 passed in W.P.No.17765 of 2007 and to accordingly revise the pension of petitioner's husband and also the petitioner's family pension and to pay the arrears thereof. 3. Mr.A.P.Muthupandian, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that petitioner has submitted a representation dated 02.04.2022 outlining her claim and grievances before the Respondents, which finds place at page no.63 of the paper book. Despite the said representation, the Respondents failed to take action, prompting the Petitioner to file the present Writ Petition seeking the aforementioned prayer. 4. Mr.F.Deepak, learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondents, submits that the Respondents are willing to consider the relief sought by the Petitioner if she makes a fresh representation before them, outlining her grievances. The Respondents would then consider and decide on the matter in accordance with the law within the time frame fixed by this Court. 5. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, agreed to the submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondents and submits that the Petitioner is willing to file a fresh representation before the 2 nd Respondent, which may be directed to be disposed of within a specified time frame. 6. After considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for both parties and perusing the records and averments made in the Writ Petition, this Court deems it appropriate that no useful purpose will be served in keeping this Writ Petition pending before this Court. 7. 6. After considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for both parties and perusing the records and averments made in the Writ Petition, this Court deems it appropriate that no useful purpose will be served in keeping this Writ Petition pending before this Court. 7. Accordingly, the Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the 2 nd Respondent/the Director of Rural Development and Panchayatraj Department, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015, detailing her claim and grievances, annexing therewith a certified copy of this order and a copy of her earlier representation dated 02.04.2022, within a period of two weeks from today. If any such representation is filed by the Petitioner before the 2 nd Respondent, as per the time stipulated by this Court, the 2 nd Respondent/the Director of Rural Development and Panchayatraj Department, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015, is directed to consider the same and pass a reasoned and speaking order on merits and in accordance with law, after giving sufficient opportunity to the Petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. The 2 nd Respondent shall communicate the order/decision to the Petitioner through Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due (RPAD) within a period of two weeks from the date of passing the order/decision. 8. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is finally disposed of There shall be no order as to costs.