ORDER : 1. Leave granted. 2. The instant appeal is directed against the order dated 13.08.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, declining to quash the Case Crime No. 137/2024, registered at Police Station Maudarwaja, District Farrukhabad, under Sections 323, 386, 447, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 3. When the Special Leave Petition came up for hearing on 24.10.2024, the following order was passed: 1. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we are satisfied that no case for quashing of the FIR Case Crime No.137/2024, registered at Police Station Maudarwaja, District Farrukhabad, under Sections 323, 386, 447, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is made out, at this stage. The relief qua the quashing of the FIR is, accordingly, declined. 2. However, keeping in view the cases registered against the petitioner in the past and the nature of allegations contained in the subject-FIR, let notice be issued as to why anticipatory bail be not granted to the petitioner, returnable on 28.11.2024. 3. Meanwhile, the arrest of the petitioner in connection with FIR Case Crime No.137/2024 shall remain stayed subject to his joining and fully cooperating with the ongoing investigation.” 4. Since the State of Uttar Pradesh took a categorical stand that the appellant had failed to join investigation, this Court, with a view to enable the investigating agency to complete the ongoing investigation, issued following directions on 28.11.2024: “3. In order to ensure that the ongoing investigation is taken to its logical conclusion without compromising with the liberty of the petitioner, the following directions are issued: (i) The petitioner has already furnished his Mobile No.9415553330 to the SHO Police Station, Maudarwaja, District Farrukhabad. The said mobile number shall remain 24 hours on. (ii) The Investigating Officer, in any of the FIRs, may inform the time, date and place to the petitioner to join the investigation. (iii) The petitioner shall abide by the notice that may be received on his Mobile Number from the Investigating Officer(s). 4. However, in no circumstances, the petitioner shall be taken into police custody either in the cases already registered against him or in a fresh case that may be registered against him, without prior permission of this Court.” 5. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The complainant, Shakuntla Devi, has also filed the counter affidavit. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The complainant, Shakuntla Devi, has also filed the counter affidavit. Some additional documents have also been placed on record. 6. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned senior counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh, besides learned counsel for the complainant. 7. There seems to be no dispute that there are 22 criminal cases registered against the appellant in different Police Stations. List of those cases has been handed over by learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Uttar Pradesh during the course of hearing and the same is taken on record. We are informed that in cases at Serial Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of the list, investigation is complete, but charge sheet could not be filed due to interim directions issued by this Court in a connected petition filed by the appellant’s brother. In rest of the cases, charge sheets have been filed. Learned senior counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh, however, points out that despite the protection granted by this Court, the appellant has not appeared before the Trial Courts and proceedings to declare him an absconder have been initiated in the following cases: 1. FIR No. 557/2024, Police Station Kotwali, Farrukhabad, in which the appellant has not appeared before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad. 2. FIR No. 661/2022, Police Station Kotwali Chhibramau District Kannauj, in which, though the arrest of the appellant has been stayed by this Court, but he is not appearing before the ADJ-5, Kannauj. 3. FIR No. 258/2023, Police Station Mohammadabad, District Fatehgarh, in which the appellant has moved an application for surrender on 10.01.2025, but he has not entered appearance so far, before the Gangster Court, ADJ-5, Farrukhabad. 4. FIR No. 357/2023, Police Station Kotwali Maudarwaza, District Farrukhabad, in which he has appeared before the Investigating Officer on 15.12.2024, but he has not entered appearance before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad. 8. Since this Court has stayed the arrest of the appellant, we see no justification for him to not appear before the Trial Courts in the above mentioned cases. This is nothing but a misuse of the concession of the interim bail. 8. Since this Court has stayed the arrest of the appellant, we see no justification for him to not appear before the Trial Courts in the above mentioned cases. This is nothing but a misuse of the concession of the interim bail. Faced with this, learned counsel undertakes that the appellant shall appear in the above stated cases within two weeks, along with appropriate applications to surrender and enable him to furnish bail bonds to the satisfaction of the respective Trial Courts. If he does so, the Trial Courts are directed to admit the Appellant to bail subject to the condition that he shall continue to appear on regular basis, unless exempted by the Trial Court. 9. However, it is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the cases so that no prejudice is caused to the appellant or the prosecution. 10. In respect of the three cases, i.e. (i) FIR No.465/2022, Police Station Kotwali, Farrukhabad; (ii) FIR No. 466/2022, Police Station Kotwali, Farrukhabad, and (iii) FIR No. 467/2022, Police Station Kotwali, Farrukhabad, it is directed that no charge sheet shall be filed till this court decides as to whether the prosecution be permitted to do so or not. 11. The appellant shall be at liberty to move application(s) for his discharge in the cases reportedly registered against him and which are pending trial before different Courts. 12. We make it clear that in case the appellant fails to surrender before the Trial Court(s) as directed above, the interim protection granted to him against arrest shall be deemed to have been withdrawn, and in that eventuality, necessary consequences shall follow. 13. As regards the order dated 28.11.2024, the same is modified/clarified to the extent that if any fresh complaint has been received against the appellant, disclosing the prima facie commission of a cognizable offence, FIR shall only be registered with prior permission of the Jurisdictional Sessions Judge. 14. The appeal is allowed in above terms. Consequently, the impugned order dated 13.08.2024 passed by the High Court is set aside. 15. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.