ORDER Kait, C.J.:-- 1. By way of present revision, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:- (i) Call for the record of the Special Case No.9500317/2014 pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (CBI), Bhopal. (ii) Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 17.5.2025, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (CBI), Bhopal, dismissing the Revisionist's discharge application filed under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (iii) Remand the matter and direct the learned trial Court to adjudicate and reconsider the discharge applications afresh, in strict accordance with established legal principles. (iv) That this Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to grant any other relief, order, or direction as it deems just, equitable, and proper under the circumstances of the case, in the broader interest of justice and fairness. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that despite a judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of a co-accused, the learned trial Judge failed to even refer to or consider the same while deciding the discharge application. It is thus contended that the impugned order is not sustainable in law. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent has contended that the order dated 17.5.2025 fully valid and justified and is in accordance with law. It is stated that no interference is warranted in the order, as the case of the present petitioner can be distinguished from the co-accused. 4. Upon perusal of the impugned order dated 17.5.2025, it is evident that the trial Court has not taken into account or even referred to the judgment cited by the petitioner’s counsel, which pertains to a co-accused and may have a bearing on the present matter. Non-consideration of relevant judgment renders the impugned order susceptible to judicial interference. 5. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 17.5.2025 is hereby quashed. The trial Court is directed to reconsider and decide the discharge application afresh, after duly considering the rival contentions of the parties, including the judgment cited by the petitioner, in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the criminal revision stands disposed of.