JUDGMENT : Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-insurance company and learned counsel appearing for the opposite party Nos. 1 to 5. 2. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the order dated 02.02.2024 passed in Execution Case No. 16 of 2019 by the learned District Judge-I-cum- P.O. (MAC), Dhanbad, whereby the learned court has been pleased to direct the petitioner to make payment of Rs. 8,07,617/- along with interest @ 9% per annum within 30 days from the date of order dated 08.05.2023 in terms of order dated 03.08.2018, passed by this Court in M.A. No. 96 of 2010. 3. Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-insurance company submits that the claimants have moved before this court for enhancement of the award in M.A. No. 96 of 2010. He submits that award was already made in favour of the claimants by the learned Tribunal and the insurance company has been directed to pay the awarded amount of Rs. 6 lakhs without interest. He further submits that the said M.A. was allowed by order dated 03.08.2018 and the petitioner was directed to pay the total compensation amount of Rs. 13,79,608/-along with simple interest @ 9% per annum thereon from the date of filing of the claim application till the date of actual payment of the amount, less the amount, if any, paid by the Petitioner to the claimants within three months from the date of receipt/ production of the copy of the order. He then submits that thereafter the petitioner and Respondents agreed to settle the matter before Mediation Centre, Dhanbad on 26.06.2019 vide Misc. Case No. 1130/2019 and it was agreed that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs. 30,00,000/- towards the awarded principal amount and interest. He submits that the claimants have filed a petition before the learned court for correcting the name of claimant Nos. 1 and 2 being Civil (Misc.) Case No. 49 of 2019, which was allowed by order dated 18.05.2022. He also submits that after coming to know about the aforesaid order, the petitioner has issued a cheque dated 06.04.2023 amounting to Rs. 28,37,961/- after deducting the TDS in favour of claimants and deposited the same before the Executing Court on 12.04.2023, which was received by the claimants. He also submits that after coming to know about the aforesaid order, the petitioner has issued a cheque dated 06.04.2023 amounting to Rs. 28,37,961/- after deducting the TDS in favour of claimants and deposited the same before the Executing Court on 12.04.2023, which was received by the claimants. He submits that the matter was compromised on 22.06.2019 and the total agreed amount was Rs. 30 lakhs and the same was agreed to be paid within one month. He further submits that the delay has occurred as there was spelling mistake in the name of the claimant Nos. 1 and 2 and Rs. Rs. 28,37,961/- after deducting the TDS has already been paid and now the learned court has illegally directed to pay the interest from the date of filing of the claim application till the actual payment. On these grounds, he submits that the impugned order may kindly be set aside. 4. Mr. M.B. Lal, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. Nos. 1 to 5 submits that the High Court has disposed of the M.A. No. 96 of 2010 by order dated 03.08.2018 directing the insurance company to satisfy the award within three months, however, in the compromise, the petitioner has agreed to pay the same within one month. He submits that within the stipulated period, neither in terms of the order of the High Court nor in terms of the compromise, the amount was paid, however, the amount was only paid on 12.04.2023. On these grounds, he submits that the learned court has rightly passed the said order. 5. It is an admitted position that the enhancement case was allowed and disposed of directing the insurance company to satisfy the award to the tune of Rs. 13,79,608/- along with simple interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing the claim application till the date of actual payment within three months, however, in the meantime, both the parties have entered into a mediation in Misc. Case No. 1130 of 2019, wherein it was agreed that the insurance company will pay a sum of Rs. 30 lakhs towards principal and interest within 30 days, however, the amount was only paid on 12.04.2023. Case No. 1130 of 2019, wherein it was agreed that the insurance company will pay a sum of Rs. 30 lakhs towards principal and interest within 30 days, however, the amount was only paid on 12.04.2023. Thus, admittedly, the amount was not deposited either within three months or within 30 days in terms of the order of the High Court and in terms of the compromise respectively and the only plea has been taken that a petition has been filed by the claimants for correction of the name of claimant Nos. 1 and 2, in view of that the said delay has occurred. Had it been a case that the aforesaid amount was deposited within the aforesaid period, even in the name of the claimants, whose names have not been corrected, the matter would have been otherwise, as such, that plea is not being accepted by this court and this court finds that by order dated 18.05.2022, the correction in the name of the claimants has been allowed, in which, the insurance company was also heard, as such, the insurance company was well knowing about the fact, however, the payment was made only on 12.04.2023. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, the court finds that the learned court has rightly passed the said order. There is no merit in this petition, as such, this petition is dismissed.