Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 392 (RAJ)

Thakur Singh v. State of Rajasthan

2025-02-17

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

body2025
ORDER : VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that for the construction of Panchayat Bhawan for Gram Panchayat, Annapurna, the land of Khasra No.660/510 is more appropriate, whereas the rival contentions have been raised that the land of Khasra No.699/518 is more conducive. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the matter may be sent to the District Collector, Balotra where the rival contentions will be raised on behalf of the parties and the District Collector, Balotra may be directed to take decision that over which land (Khasra No.699/518 or Khasra No. 660/510) the construction of Panchayat Bhawan is more beneficial for the people of that area by passing a speaking order. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that if such representations are filed, the same shall be decided by District Collector, Balotra and a decision for the welfare of the large number of people of that area will be taken by taking into consideration the more suitable place for construction of the Panchayat Bhawan. 4. In view of the submissions made before this Court, the present writ petitions are disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to appear before the District Collector, Balotra by way of filing appropriate representations along with supporting documents and the rival contentions shall be decided by the District Collector, Balotra. 5. The District Collector, Balotra shall pass a speaking order for construction of the Panchayat Bhawan on the land which is more beneficial for the villagers of the area. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the District Collector, Balotra within a period of 10 days and the District Collector, Balotra shall decide the rival contentions within a period of three weeks thereafter.