ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners placed reliance on a judgment of this Court in Shah Nawaz Khan & Ors. vs. State of Nagaland & Ors. [ (2023) 11 SCC 376 ] to contend that the transfer from one High Court to another with respect to suit, appeal or other proceedings is not permissible. 3. Per contra, learned Advocate General appearing for the respondent has placed reliance on a Notification No. G.S.R. 73(E) dated 7th February, 1990 notifying Gauhati High Court (Establishment of a Permanent Bench at Kohima) Order, 1990 regarding establishment of a permanent Bench of the Gauhati High Court at Kohima. As per the said notification, it is clear that the Bench at Kohima would be a permanent Bench of the Gauhati High Court. Proviso to Clause 2 of the said notification deals with the contingency that the Chief Justice may, in his discretion, order that any case or class of cases arising in the State of Nagaland shall be heard at Gauhati. 4. In the present case, by an administrative order, proceedings pending before the permanent Bench at Kohima have been ordered to be called for hearing at Principal Bench at Gauhati. Considering the contents of the notification and the power conferred by proviso to Clause 2, transfer of the case which is pending before the Bench at Kohima to the Principal seat, as directed by the administrative order, does not call for any interference. The judgment in the case of Shah Nawaz Khan (supra), is of no help and is not applicable in the facts of this case. Therefore, we are not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, it is dismissed. 5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.