Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 561 (RAJ)

Ajmal Husain S/o Shri Khushi Mohammad v. Union of India

2025-03-03

DINESH MEHTA

body2025
ORDER : DINESH MEHTA, J. 1. While issuing notice, on 02.04.2019 (in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.4883/2019, 4889/2019 & 4890/2019) and on 03.04.2019 (in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.4946/2019 &4938/2019), following interim orders were passed by the Court:- “In the meanwhile, the respondents, in case, they have required from outsourcing agency to engage/provide persons for the positions the petitioners are working, shall continue with the petitioners and in case, any additional workmen are required, the same may be engaged through the outsourcing agency.” 2. Mr. Sodha, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the interim orders, some of the employees have been retained by the respondent-placement agency and some of them have moved ahead in life and left the job. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute this position and the fact that some of the petitioners have been engaged by them. 4. While making the interim orders dated 02.04.2019 and 03.04.2019 passed in above writ petitions absolute, the present writ petitions stand disposed of. 5. Stay applications also stand disposed of accordingly.