Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 570 (RAJ)

Sheela D/O Shri Dhanraj v. Rajasthan High Court

2025-03-04

BHUWAN GOYAL, MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA

body2025
ORDER : 1. Heard. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a direction to the respondents to allow the petitioner to appear in the examination by accepting the copies of the judgments submitted by the petitioner. 3. Ms. Sheela, petitioner appearing in person through video conferencing, would submit that the petitioner had certain medical ailment and teeth problem because of which she could not remove the deficiency within the stipulated time, but soon after 24.01.2025, she sent copies of the judgments by speed post on 01.02.2025. It is submitted that during the period, when the process of scrutiny was going on, notification was issued on 14.01.2025 requiring the candidates to remove the deficiencies in their particular case, mobile of the petitioner was also destroyed and she could not come to know about the notification. 4. With all sympathy at our command, we cannot allow a candidate who has failed to fulfill the requirement of removal of deficiencies in accordance with notification dated 14.01.2025. 5. After submission of application form and copies of ten judgments as required under the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010 (for short ‘the Rules of 2010’), the same were scrutinised and it was found that one judgment submitted by the petitioner was not in conformity with the requirement of Rule 36 of the Rules of 2010. There were large number of candidates, whose applications were found to be defective for one reason or the other. Vide notification dated 14.01.2025, all those candidates including the petitioner were granted time to remove the deficiencies in their particular case by 24.01.2025. May be because of some ailment, the petitioner could not completely remove the deficiencies within time, however, that cannot be a ground to derail the examination process. For individual grievance and difficulties, the process of selection cannot be allowed to be amended, nor any indulgence can be granted to allow the candidates to remove the deficiencies beyond the time provided under notification dated 14.01.2025. If such a prayer is accepted, it will open flood gate and every candidate, who failed to remove the deficiencies within stipulated period, will start claiming further time and indulgence. In this manner, the examination process, which has to be conducted and concluded within stipulated period as per time schedule, would be completely derailed. 6. Therefore, in these circumstances, we are unable to provide any relief to the petitioner. 7. In this manner, the examination process, which has to be conducted and concluded within stipulated period as per time schedule, would be completely derailed. 6. Therefore, in these circumstances, we are unable to provide any relief to the petitioner. 7. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.