Research › Search › Judgment

Jharkhand High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 617 (JHR)

Brijlal Bedia v. Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh

2025-02-25

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

body2025
JUDGMENT : ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J. F.A. No. 82 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1475 of 2022, F.A. No. 84 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1489 of 2022, F.A. No. 85 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1479 of 2022 F.A. No. 86 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1485 of 2022, F.A. No. 87 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1473 of 2022, F.A. No. 93 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1484 of 2022, F.A. No. 94 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1486 of 2022 , F.A. No. 96 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1487 of 2022, F.A. No. 99 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1474 of 2022 and F.A. No. 101 of 2017 with I.A. No. 1480 of 2022. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. The interlocutory applications has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 1354 days (In all appeals). 3. The learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the matter arises out of land acquisition proceedings and the reason for condonation of delay is that the appellants are extremely poor persons and they were not able to arrange money.The learned counsel for the appellants has also submitted that for the similarly situated adjoining villages arising out of the same date of acquisition different rate of compensation has been fixed which is higher amount and the villagers are tribal and are poor persons. He submits that the villagers are entitled for adequate compensation as per the provisions of law and therefore, the delay be condoned. 4. No counter affidavit has been filed to the aforesaid interlocutory applications for condonation of delay. However, the learned counsel for the respondents have opposed the prayer and have submitted that the other cases which the appellants are referring have already been taken care of in the impugned judgment and they have submitted that adequate compensation has already been given to the appellants as per provision of law. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the averments made in the petition for condonation of delay and being satisfied with the cause shown by the appellants, delay in filing the appeals is condoned. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the averments made in the petition for condonation of delay and being satisfied with the cause shown by the appellants, delay in filing the appeals is condoned. The interlocutory applications I.A. No. 1475 of 2022, I.A. No. 1489 of 2022, I.A. No. 1479 of 2022, I.A. No. 1485 of 2022, I.A. No. 1473 of 2022, I.A. No. 1484 of 2022, I.A. No. 1486 of 2022, I.A. No. 1487 of 2022, I.A. No. 1474 of 2022 and I.A. No. 1480 of 2022 are hereby allowed 6. At this, the learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that let these appeals be admitted. 7. Admit 8. Let the records be called for from the concerned court. It appears that only one set of records would suffice. 9. Post these cases on 24 th March, 2025 for final disposal. 10. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail.