Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 660 (RAJ)

Jitendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

2025-03-07

KULDEEP MATHUR

body2025
ORDER : KULDEEP MATHUR, J. 1. This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.134/2024 registered at Police Station Pindwara, District Sirohi, for the offences under Sections 452 , 302 , 323 , 354 and 143 of IPC . 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the co- accused persons namely Janakpal Singh (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.12597/2024), Mahipal Singh (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.10822/2024) and Manohar Singh (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.11462/2024) and Ajit Singh (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.15447/2024) have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 26.11.2024 and 12.12.2024 respectively. Drawing attention of this Court towards the FIR, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not been named in the FIR. Learned counsel further submitted that the complainant Sarif Khan who has also allegedly received grievous injuries in the alleged incident which occurred on 25.03.2024 has not assigned any specific role to the present petitioners for committing the alleged crime. 4. Lastly, learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody; investigation against the present petitioners has already been concluded; challan has already been filed against the present petitioner by the competent Criminal Court and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners. 5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by the this Court. 6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, this Court prima facie finds that the petitioners have not been assigned any specific role in the alleged incident which occurred on 25.03.2024. Thus, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed. Thus, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners Jitendra Singh S/o Mohan Singh and Pritam M. Suthar S/o Mithalal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.134/2024 registered at Police Station Pindwara, District Sirohi, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, for their appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.