ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Even according to the case of the second respondent, he filed multiple complaints complaining about the incident in respect of which the offence has been registered. On a query made by this Court, the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent accepted that neither in any of the complaints nor in his statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, "the Cr.PC"), the second respondent has even named the appellants. For the first time in his examination-in-chief before the Court, the second respondent has ascribed a role to the appellants. He has not stated in the examination-in-chief that when the complaints were filed by him, he was not aware of the involvement of the appellants. In view of this factual situation, the Court was not justified in allowing the application under Section 319 of the Cr.PC. 4. Accordingly, the impugned judgment dated 30th January, 2024 passed by the High Court and the order dated 3rd January, 2023 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate are hereby set aside and the application under Section 319 of the Cr.PC made by the first respondent stands dismissed. 5. The Appeal is, accordingly, allowed.