Order : 1. Counsel for the appellant submits that present was a clear case of fake involvement of vehicle as the FIR as lodged on the next day of accident reflected the accident to be caused by an unknown vehicle. It is only on the statements of alleged eye-witness Sata Ram (AW-2) that the vehicle in question was implicated. 2. Counsel submitted that the said eye-witness as well as the driver, owner of the vehicle in question and the claimants belonged to the same/nearby village. 3. He further submits that the stark contradiction in the statements of the alleged eye-witness Sata Ram (AW-2) and the informant Mehardin (AW-3) also proved the fact that the vehicle in question was implicated subsequently. 4. In view of the submissions made, Admit. Issue notice. 5. As counsel Mr. G.S. Rathore has put in appearance for respondent-claimants No.1 to 8, notices need not be issued to them. 6. Notices be issued to respondent Nos.9 and 10 only. Notices be filed in two sets within a period of one week. On the same being filed, one set be given 'dasti' to learned counsel for the appellant for service through registered post acknowledgement due. Notices be made returnable on 15.04.2025. Postal receipts of the 'dasti' notices be filed within a period of one week from the date of receipt of 'dasti' notices. 7. Heard on stay petition. 8. Effect, operation and execution of the impugned judgment and award dated 16.07.2024 shall remain stayed till the final disposal of the present appeal. 9. Stay petition stands disposed of. 10. Call for the record.