Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 706 (HP)

Baljeet Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

2025-04-09

BIPIN CHANDER NEGI

body2025
JUDGMENT : Bipin Chander Negi, J. The present bail petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for grant of regular bail. The same arises out of FIR No.96 of 2024, dated 22.06.2024, registered at Police Station Dhalli, Shimla, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, under Sections 21, 25 and 29 of NDPS Act. 2. Status report filed, the same is taken on record. Copy whereof supplied to learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Heard counsel for the parties. 4. The Police Authority, in the case at hand, while on patrolling duty and also detection of crime in the suburbs of Shimla, had received a secret information that the bail petitioner along with co-accused-Angrej Singh had taken a room on rent in Tota Ram Building Lower Sangti. On the basis of the same, after complying with the provisions of the NDPS Act and on associating independent witnesses, a search of the room of the accused/bail petitioner and co-accused was conducted, wherein after 46.82 grams of heroin along with an electronic weighing machine was recovered. 5. The investigation in the case at hand is complete and post completion of investigation, challan in case at hand has been filed before the concerned Court on 20.08.2024. Charges, in the case at hand, have been framed. Matter is now listed for recording of prosecution witnesses before the trial Court on 03.05.2025. 6. At the time of deciding the bail petition, a detailed discussion of evidence so collected and produced by the prosecution, is to be avoided, as it may cause prejudice to the case of the prosecution or to the case of the accused/applicant. 7. Bail petitioner is in custody since 22.06.2024. Trial is going to take time for its conclusion. The charges against the bail petitioner are yet to be proved. Pre-trial incarceration is not the rule. No past criminal history has been attributed to the present bail petitioner. Further detention of the accused would not serve any fruitful purpose, rather would prove pre-judicial to the rights of the petitioner. 8. Punishment begins after conviction. Every man is deemed to be innocent until duly tried and duly found guilty. The consequences of pre-trial incarceration are grave. A person presumed innocent is subjected to psychological and physical deprivations of jail. Further, a jailed individual is prevented from contributing to the preparation of his defence. 9. 8. Punishment begins after conviction. Every man is deemed to be innocent until duly tried and duly found guilty. The consequences of pre-trial incarceration are grave. A person presumed innocent is subjected to psychological and physical deprivations of jail. Further, a jailed individual is prevented from contributing to the preparation of his defence. 9. The object of bail is to secure the attendance of the accused person at his trial by reasonable amount of bail. The object of bail is neither punitive nor preventive. 10. The respondent/State in the status report filed have not expressed any apprehension regarding the petitioner fleeing from the course of justice and adversely affecting the trial by intimidating the witnesses. In this regard, suffice it to state that the petitioner can be put to terms for the purpose of safe, secure and unobstructed completion of trial. 11. Hence, after going through the material available on record and considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court finds that the present is a fit case where judicial discretion to admit the petitioner on bail is required to be exercised in his favour. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, who has been arrested by the police, in FIR No.96 of 2024, dated 22.06.2024, registered at Police Station Dhalli, Shimla, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, under Sections 21, 25 and 29 of NDPS Act, shall be forthwith released on bail, subject to his furnishing personal bond to the tune of Rs.50,000/- [Rupees fifty thousand] with one local surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court. This bail order is subject, however, to the following conditions:-. This bail order is subject, however, to the following conditions:-. (i) Petitioner shall attend the trial Court on each and every date of hearing and if prevented by any reason to do so, seek exemption from appearance by filing appropriate application; (ii) Petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation in any manner whatsoever; (iii) Petitioner will not leave India without prior permission of the Court; (iv) Petitioner shall not make any inducement, threat or promise, directly or indirectly, to the victim and Investigating Officer or any person acquainted with the facts of the case to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer; (v) Petitioner shall inform the Station House Officer of the concerned police station about his place of residence during bail and trial. Any change in the same shall also be communicated within two weeks thereafter. Petitioner shall furnish details of his Aadhar Card, Telephone Number, Email, PAN Card, Bank Account Number, if any; & (vi) It is made clear that in case petitioner is arraigned as an accused, in future, in any FIR, then his bail is liable to be cancelled. It is open for the Investigating Agency to move appropriate application in that regard. 12. Needless to say that the Investigating agency shall be at liberty to move this Court for cancellation of the bail, if any of the aforesaid conditions are violated by the petitioner. 13. Be it stated that any expression of opinion given in this order does not mean an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and the trial Court will not be influenced by any observations made therein. 14. The Registry is directed to forward a soft copy of the bail order to the Superintendent, Model Central Jail Kanda, District Shimla, H.P., through email, with a direction to enter the date of grant of bail in the e-prison software. 15. In case, the petitioner is not released within a period of seven days from the date of grant of bail, the Superintendent, Model Central Jail Kanda, District Shimla, H.P., is directed to inform this fact to the Secretary, DLSA, Shimla. 15. In case, the petitioner is not released within a period of seven days from the date of grant of bail, the Superintendent, Model Central Jail Kanda, District Shimla, H.P., is directed to inform this fact to the Secretary, DLSA, Shimla. The Superintendent, Model Central Jail Kanda, District Shimla, H.P., is further directed that if the petitioner fails to furnish the bail bonds, as per the order passed by this Court, within a period of one month from today, the said fact be submitted to this Court. 16. The petition stands accordingly disposed of. A copy of this order be sent to the Superintendent, Model Central Jail Kanda, District Shimla, H.P. and the learned trial Court by FASTER. 17. A downloaded copy of this order shall be accepted by the learned Trial Court while accepting the bail bonds from the petitioner and in case, said Court intends to ascertain the veracity of the downloaded copy of the order presented to it, same may be ascertained from the official website of this Court.