Order : 1. Grievance of petitioners is that the land of khasra Nos.419 and 420 (Old Khasra No. 353) situated at village Manpur Devri @ Golyawas Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur measuring 7 bigha and 14 biswa, was acquired by the State Government to develop the Prithviraj Nagar Scheme and award dated 13.04.1991 was passed, however no compensation, either in monetary form or in form of grant of 25% developed land (20% residential and 5% commercial) has been given to the Khatedar. 2. It has been pointed out that at one point of time, the acquisition was put to challenge, however at later point of time, Government itself deacquisitioned the land but ultimately the acquisition was affirmed. During such process, various litigations were commenced by the petitioners and their predecessors for awarding compensation or to save their possession. 3. It has been pointed out that one Cooperative Society namely, Shankar Bhawan Nirman Sahkari Samiti, through agreement to sale dated 15.07.1981, claimed to purchase the land and allegedly developed a residential scheme viz. Bahubali Nagar Vistar Vikas samiti, hence petitioners initiated proceedings before the Tribunal against regularization of the scheme. In the meanwhile, the JDA regularized the scheme by organizing camp on 22.02.2024 but compensation to the petitioners (predecessor of the original Khatedar) has not been given. 4. The bottom line of argument of counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioners are at least entitled to get the compensation of their agricultural lands, which have been acquired by the JDA, to develop Prithviraj Nagar Scheme and whereupon Samiti has carved out a Bahubali Nagar Vistar Vikas samiti, which too has been approved. 5. On behalf of respondents No.1 and 2-JDA, appearance has been given by the counsel, way back in December, 2023 but reply to the writ petition has not been filed till date. 6. Counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2-JDA prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply. 7. In case, reply is not filed within a period of four weeks, JDA has to pay cost of Rs.20,000/- to the petitioners and the Secretary, JDA shall furnish an explanation for not filing the reply. 8. On behalf of respondent No.3-Bahubali Nagar Vistar Vikas Samiti, counsel has put in appearance and submits that Vikas Samiti has no concern with the grant of compensation to the petitioners since the issue is between the petitioners and JDA. 9. 8. On behalf of respondent No.3-Bahubali Nagar Vistar Vikas Samiti, counsel has put in appearance and submits that Vikas Samiti has no concern with the grant of compensation to the petitioners since the issue is between the petitioners and JDA. 9. In that view of matter, no interim order is required to be passed in the matter, hence the stay application is hereby dismissed. 10. Let the writ petition be listed alongwith SBCWP Nos.110/2025 and 2995/2025. 11. Let copy of this order be sent to the Secretary, JDA.