ORDER : Rajesh Shankar, J. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.1 in Contempt Case No.203 of 2024 submits that the appointment letters of two petitioners i.e. Vishwanath Mahli and Anita Toppo have already been issued. So far as the petitioners Ajay Minz, Dhananjay Paswan, Bhishma Narayan Sharma, Raju Xess, Ranjeet Khalkho, Praveen Kr. Rajak, Renu Singh and Sushma Devi are concerned, the Committee has recommended their names for appointment. So far as the petitioners Pooja Nayak, Shobha Minz, Nagendra Mahli, Akash Franciss Toppo, Sita Devi, Dilip Kumar and Anil Kumar Singh are concerned, they have not been found eligible for appointment. The said fact would be evident from Annexure-B to the show cause affidavit dated 6 th March, 2025 filed on behalf of the opposite party no.1. Learned counsel, however, submits at Bar that so far as the petitioner Nilam Kumari is concerned, her candidature has also been rejected but due to inadvertence, her name could not be mentioned in Annexure-B to the said show cause affidavit. 2. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.1 appearing in Contempt Case No.493 of 2024 submits that only one petitioner i.e. Md. Tanveer Ahmad (wrongly mentioned as Md. Tanveer Alam in Annexure-B/2 of the show cause affidavit dated 6 th March, 2025 filed on behalf of the opposite party no.1) has been recommended for appointment. Other petitioners have not been found eligible for appointment. Hence, their names have not been recommended. 3. Mr. Sreenu Garapati, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.1 in Contempt Case No.203 of 2024, assures the Court that the appointment letters with respect to the petitioners, whose names have been recommended, will be issued positively by 19 th March, 2025. 4. Despite the fact that the order dated 17 th January, 2025 passed in the present contempt cases has not been fully complied by the opposite party no.1, he is not physically present before this Court. However, keeping in view the aforesaid assurance given on behalf of the opposite party no.1, this Court is not passing any coercive order against the said opposite party today. The opposite party no.1 is directed to file compliance affidavit by 20 th March, 2025 annexing the copies of the appointment letters of the concerned petitioners failing which he shall remain physically present before this Court on the next date fixed. 5. The opposite party no.1 is directed to file compliance affidavit by 20 th March, 2025 annexing the copies of the appointment letters of the concerned petitioners failing which he shall remain physically present before this Court on the next date fixed. 5. Put up these cases under the same heading on 21 st March, 2025.