Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 874 (RAJ)

Pintu v. State of Rajasthan

2025-03-20

KULDEEP MATHUR

body2025
Order : KULDEEP MATHUR, J 1. This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.119/2024, registered at Police Station Delwara, District Rajsamand, for offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1) & 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 5(l)/6 of POCSO Act. 2. Drawing attention of the Court towards the statements of the victim ‘S’ as PW-1 and other material prosecution witnesses viz. Dalu (PW-2), Nandudi (PW-3) & Mukesh (PW-4) recorded before the competent Criminal Court, Learned counsel submitted that the victim ‘S’ along with material prosecution witnesses during their Court statements have not supported the prosecution story and have turned hostile. It was submitted that since the victim ‘S’ during her Court statements has not supported the prosecution story and has turned hostile, the chances of the petitioner getting convicted in present case are very bleak. 3. Lastly, learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody; the statements of the material prosecution witnesses have already been recorded before the competent Criminal Court and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that looking to the seriousness of the allegations levelled against the present petitioner, he does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that the material prosecution witnesses during their Court statements have not supported the prosecution story. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record. 6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record. 6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Pintu S/o Shri Prabhu , arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.119/2024, registered at Police Station Delwara, District Rajsamand, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, for his appearance before that Court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial. 8. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.