Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2025 DIGILAW 919 (RAJ)

Pappu Ram v. State of Rajasthan

2025-03-24

KULDEEP MATHUR

body2025
Order : 1. This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.108/2024 registered at Police Station Kalu (Bikaner), District Bikaner for the offences under Sections 332(b), 64(1), 78(2) and 79 of BNS. 2. Heard learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record. 3. Upon perusal of the case file, this Court prima facie finds that the victim Mst.’R’ is a married woman. According to her case, on 21.10.2024, the petitioner came inside her house and committed forcible sexual assault upon her. When she shouted for help, the petitioner was apprehended on the spot by her brother-in-law Shri Anand. The same version has been stated in the statements recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S. with some exception. 4. This Court prima facie finds that though as per the prosecution, the petitioner on the date of alleged incident, has committed forcible sexual assault upon the prosecutrix, however the documents viz. Whatsapp chats and call details attached with the case file, indicate that the prosecutrix was having friendly relationship with the petitioner since long. The FIR has been lodged after about 4 days from the date of alleged incident. The petitioner was beaten by the brother in law and husband of the prosecutrix on the date of alleged incident whereupon he was admitted in a hospital. In the prima facie opinion of this Court, looking to the nature of evidence available on record, the possibility of prosecutrix having consensual relationship with the present petitioner cannot be ruled out at this stage. The petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents and the statements of the victim during investigation have already been recorded. 5. Thus, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, is inclined to enlarge the petitioner, who is in judicial custody since 22.12.2024 and investigation against whom has already been concluded, on bail. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed. 5. Thus, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, is inclined to enlarge the petitioner, who is in judicial custody since 22.12.2024 and investigation against whom has already been concluded, on bail. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Pappu Ram S/ o Sohan Ram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.108/2024 registered at Police Station Kalu (Bikaner), District Bikaner shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial. 7. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.